|
Francis Vyvyan Jago Arundell, British chaplain at İzmir between
1822–1834, was the first person to define and study the city. In 1828
he published the record of his first journey to inner Anatolia made in
1826 as A visit to the seven Churches of Asia. His notes after his
second journey in 1833 were published under the title Discoveries in
Asia Minor: including a description of the ruins of several ancient
cities and especially Antioch of Pisidia in London in 1834.
W.J. Hamilton came to the region passing over the Sultan Mountains and
observed the aqueducts, bath, and great basilica. His notes were
published as “Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus, Armenia” in 1842. He
was followed at different periods by many famous explorers of the 19th
century such as Tchihatcheff, Laborde, Ritter, Richter, but none of
them have the power of Arundell's detailed study, until Ramsay.
The famous researcher W.M. Ramsay, who devoted 50 years of his life to
the historical geography of Asia Minor, made his first journey to
Anatolia in 1880. Together with J.R.S. Sterret he embarked on two
journeys studying inscriptions which provided detailed historical
information. On both journeys they visited Antioch. In the same period
Weber concentrated his studies on aqueducts: the water system was
examined and the monumental fountain was identified. The outcomes of
Ramsay's studies up to 1905 were published in 1907 as The cities of
St.Paul. Their influence on his Life and Thought.
In 1911 Ramsay and his wife, W.M. Calder and M.M. Hardie made camp in
Antioch and studies were started systematically. Calder and Hardie
explored the Sanctuary of Men Askaenos which is on Karakuyu Hill 5 km
to the southeast of Antioch. The following year, excavations were made
under the direction of Ramsay and were supported by Princeton
University. During these excavations up to 1914, some important
buildings were excavated in and around the city. In 1914 one of the
breathtaking finds of archaeology, the ”Res Gestae Divi Augusti”,
appeared as fragments in front of the Imperial Sanctuary. After a
compulsory break during the Great War, Ramsay returned in 1923.
In 1924 a major expedition was mounted by F W Kelsey of the University of Michigan which included Ramsay.
The excavations were under the direction of D.M. Robinson and,
employing at times over 200 men from Yalvac, the Great Basilica,
Tiberia Platea, Propylon and monumental western gate were exposed. Then
after only one year of excavation the work of the Michigan group
ceased, the result of the bitter quarrel between Ramsay and Robinson.
The only person who might have had the authority to resolve matters was
Kelsey, and he died in 1927. Ramsay visited again between 1925 and 1927
but without any major results. No further studies were made until the
1960s. During this long interval many of the architectural blocks from
these major buildings were used by the natives for the construction of
modern Yalvaç and by the early 1960s, when Yalvaç Museum was about to
be built, Antioch had become buried again.
In 1962 a detailed survey was made by M.H. Ballance and A. Frazer. K.
Tuchelt came to the city in 1976 and caused some new arguments about
the Imperial Sanctuary. Stephen Mitchell and Marc Waelkens conducted a
survey and documentation of Antioch between 1982–3. Using their
discoveries and drawing from earlier studies, especially those of the
University of Michigan in 1924, they subsequently brought together all
the available information about the city, supported with new finds, in
a book entitled ”Pisidian Antioch” (1998).
Today's Antioch is studied by Dr. Mehmet Taşlıalan, Director of Yalvaç
Museum (1979–2002), and Tekin Bayram, Mayor of Yalvaç. Mr. Taşlıalan
obtained his Ph.D. thesis on the Imperial Sanctuary and described the
building known as the Great Basilica as the Church of St.Paul.
Acropolis and fortifications
The city, like other Hellenistic colonies, was founded on a hill for
ease of defence. The steep valley of the River Anthius in the east
provides a perfect defence. On the other slopes the acropolis goes up
smoothly in terraces and reaches a height of 60 meters above the plain.
It is not known whether the bastions of semi-circular plan which can be
seen in the West continue in other parts of the defence walls.
The city is surrounded by re-used blocks made of mainly grey local
limestone. The massive blocked wall structure of the earlier phases are
different the from the mortared Byzantine-Early Christian walls. No
clear evidence of defence towers has yet been found. Curved
semi-circular walls in the south and north would have made it easier to
defend the fortifications. The defence system, when the masonry of the
walls is considered, is very similar to the neighbouring colonies
Cremna, Sagalassos and even Aphrodisias in Caria. Most of the walls and
defence system are from the 4th century AD. Other buried entrances and
fortifications datable back to the Hellenistic period will no doubt
come to light as excavations continue.
The acropolis was a defended space to which natives retreated during
wartime or invasion: houses and farms however, were outside the walls.
Especially in the west and east, on the slopes going down to the plain
the remains of houses have been found. The location of the necropolis
is not known, but pieces of sarcophagi, Phrygian door-tombstones and
funeral inscriptions in the walls of the houses in the modern Kızılca
Quarter are indications that the necropolis should be looked for there.
City plan
Most of the city has not been excavated and questions like, for
example, the relationship between the Theatre and the Cardo Maximus
cannot yet be fully explained. There is much which is still buried
under the hills in the potential excavation area of 800 by 1000 meters.
Electromagnetic studies in recent years have shown that the Hippodamic
plan with streets at right-angles was applied successfully like at
Priene and Miletos. The city was divided by the streets into quarters
(vicus, plural vici). The names of the following vici are known from
inscriptions: Venerius, Velabrus, Aediculus, Patricius, Cermalus,
Salutaris and Tuscus, but their extent has yet to be established.
One of the two principal streets is the Decumanus Maximus which starts
from the Western City Gate and it is 90+320 m long. The other is the
Cardo Maximus which is 400 m. long and it starts from the Nympheum and
crosses the Decumanus c. 70 m south of the Tiberia Platea. On both
sides of the streets are ruins dating back to the 1st–2nd centuries
A.D. The name Platea is used for large areas of street-squares
surrounded by shops and porticos. In the eastern Roman provinces, the
platea became colonaded streets. The discovery of monumental buildings
and especially of several nympheums on both sides of these two
colonaded main streets prove that this was something which occurred in
Antioch also.
|